| REGISTERIT'S FREE! |
 |
 |
 |
RECEIVE custom news |
 |
 |
TRACK your favorites |
 |
 |
BUILD your fan profile |
 |
 |
POST messages |
 |
| LOGIN | SIGN UP TODAY |
|
| V For Vendetta |
 |
| It's about terrorism, so... |
 |
| POSTED Thursday, March 09, 2006 08:02:17 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 17, 2006 03:48:18 PM |
|
Seriously,,,, I mean.. I loved the movie,, The message was great,, but even my mom, that enjoyed the movie allot, Was guessing that it might get banned in the US, because its a pretty Powerful movie against the Government and for the people. But I agree, its gonna be very talked about. Hair Ball |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 17, 2006 06:17:51 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 17, 2006 06:41:26 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 17, 2006 09:58:45 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 17, 2006 10:17:54 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:03:54 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:52:31 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 11:58:32 AM |
|
| I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 12:36:44 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
its just a movie..... jeeze The Metal-Head X-STUD
If it ain't metal, IT SUCKS!!!
Look up the word hypocrite in the dictionary, and you'll see Matacron written next to it.
|
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 12:54:10 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
Hey theres a better idea than that, they could come to the UK. Look buddy take a chill pill, relax, it's a FILM. Some people just take life too seriously. Now maybe terrorism is a bad thing. But most governments are pains in the back sides, and if, like in some cases they go to far, and sometimes it seems like most do, its about time someone stuck it to the man. Like it says in School of Rock, you've got to stick it to the man. Don't let the man get you down, this, and i admit I haven't seen it yet but from the trailer it seems its more a person who wants to stick it to the man, basically telling him to go get stuffed.
Oh and BMW i agree with you about that song BYOB would suit it down to the ground, well from what Ive seen of the trailer. I aint seen it yet but I gotta buy it. Someone who revolts against an oppressive government, a rebel - rebels are cool. well in my opinion anyway.
Rule Britannia yeah! lol |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Saturday, March 18, 2006 01:15:44 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
people complain allot about 9/11, and I mean,, ya, it was a Big tragedy, it was sad, but do you know what was done in Iraq ? to you know How many people died that had nothing at all To do with 9/11 ? do you know that this "war" was just for OIL, not even for what happened in 9/11 ? Do you know that every day there's More Evidence of Bush being behind 9/11 ?,,, well,,, not really Bush,,,, his just a puppet,,, but the people who tell him what to do/ and what to say,,, Did you watch "Fahrenheit 9/11" yet ?. and even that movie was hiding allot of other facts, Alex Jones also gave more facts that Michael Moore missed out. I'm for Peace, I don't believe in Bombs and Terrorist acts, but I also don't believe in Wars for money, and in Pollution, and in what Bush is doing, and I honestly don't know why people keep voting him back, but I guess the other guy wasn't any "Hero" neither. What I'm saying is that, these movies are good because its making people Finally see Color, and not only Black & White / Good & Bad. See The Bigger Picture ! Try to understand what the Reasons for blowing a building up would be,,, even if its not a good enough reason, but atleast try to see why someone would wanna do something like that,, without it just being because his "bad" and you're "good",,,, because,,, Americans can become Terrorists too ,,, not only Immigrants, you know ? Hair Ball |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Sunday , March 19, 2006 12:44:55 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Monday , March 20, 2006 06:47:05 AM |
|
Catboy said: Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
people complain allot about 9/11, and I mean,, ya, it was a Big tragedy, it was sad, but do you know what was done in Iraq ? to you know How many people died that had nothing at all To do with 9/11 ? do you know that this "war" was just for OIL, not even for what happened in 9/11 ? Do you know that every day there's More Evidence of Bush being behind 9/11 ?,,, well,,, not really Bush,,,, his just a puppet,,, but the people who tell him what to do/ and what to say,,, Did you watch "Fahrenheit 9/11" yet ?. and even that movie was hiding allot of other facts, Alex Jones also gave more facts that Michael Moore missed out. I'm for Peace, I don't believe in Bombs and Terrorist acts, but I also don't believe in Wars for money, and in Pollution, and in what Bush is doing, and I honestly don't know why people keep voting him back, but I guess the other guy wasn't any "Hero" neither. What I'm saying is that, these movies are good because its making people Finally see Color, and not only Black & White / Good & Bad. See The Bigger Picture ! Try to understand what the Reasons for blowing a building up would be,,, even if its not a good enough reason, but atleast try to see why someone would wanna do something like that,, without it just being because his "bad" and you're "good",,,, because,,, Americans can become Terrorists too ,,, not only Immigrants, you know ?
The first thing I want to say is thatI never meant to sound harsh, and that's my bad for seeming that way. All I wanted to do was to ask a logical questions based upon the statements that were made.
When it comes down to it, my first point was about supporting "terrorists" in movies, and how those beliefs affect real life. Obviously, events in movies do not often happen in reality (maybe with the "Heat" bank robbery years ago, and some others). Even though events don't often permeate into real life, ideas, ideals, ways, and means often do. Case in point, "sticking it to the man." The terroist V "sticks it to the man" in London, Timothy McVeigh "sticks it to the man" in Oklahoma City, and Al Qeada "sticks it to the man" in New York City. All three of these groups, whether they are real or fictional have common ground and similar view-points in ideas, ideals, ways, and means.
The point: you can't have it both ways. You logically cannot support a fictional terrorist while condemning real terrorists, both parties of which have the same ideas, ideals, ways, and means of "sticking it to the man" - or in this case, hatred of government, killing innocents and destroying property.
People often want their cake and eat it to. Another case in point is saying that Bush invaded Iraq simply for oil. A lot of people believe this and are very angry. However, if this is what they believe, is it not hypocritical for these people to continue to go to the local gas station to fill up on the substance that Bush went to war over? Even further, would it not also be hypocritical to line the pockets of the oil companies when paying $2.50 a gallon to give those companies record-breaking profits in 2005? Again, you can't have it both ways. If people really believe Bush went to war for oil, then they need to stop giving the oil companies money. Otherwise, your actually supporting Bush.
The Iraq war is touchy topic. I don't agree with the Administration's excuse of WMD's to invade. However, I will say kicking Saddam out of power and finding 600 mass graves of the thousands of people he killed is a noble effort. I'll say that finding out that France, Russia, and Germany were getting kickbacks from the Oil-for-Food program has exposed the reasons why there was not a "coalition" like the first Gulf War (the world now knows that these three countries were all in bed with Saddam). I'll also say that it's interesting to note that more documents coming out of Iraq shows that Saddam had meetings with bin Laden's people and perhaps bin Laden himself. And even further, the US military was able to shut down an Al Qeada training camp in Northern Iraq. All of this is true and can be researched through boortz.com or google.
And the last point, it was recommended that I see Farrinhiet 911. Micheal Moore has been proven to be a liar through his editing of news footage throughout all of that movie. I say movie, because if it was a documentary, he would show both sides of the issue...which I've heard he doesn't do. He's such a left wing hack, he's doesn't have credibility anymore. A single example. I've heard in the movie that it says Bush is the one who sends bin Laden's family - here in the US - on a plane to get them out when all flights were grounded. It's been proven, from actual statements, that it was Richard Clarke - the terror Czar for Bush 41, Clinton, and for part of Bush 42. To add to that, both F-911 and Clarke's book - one that bashes the President - came out at the exact same time. Interesting... |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , March 20, 2006 12:53:23 PM |
|
| Excuse me but you say they found mass graves, ive heard much about saddam hussein and him being an 'Evil' man, but apart from whats on telly and whats in the newspaper wheres the proof, i cannot honestly say i take much note of the media, i dont trust it, its secondary evidence. For someone to say Saddam was a bad man based on secondary evidence seems a bit much. Now if they had primary evidence, i.e they actually saw these atrocities, then it may be more believable but everyone sees it on tv and in the newspapers, these are not always infallible, they can be wrong. But if you see it with your own eyes then it's less infallible. Basically unless you actually see things happen do not, i suggest be so quick to make or pass judgement. And its not just this topic, but in newspapers in general, all people know sometimes is what they read in a paper, so they hear something that has happened in the newspapers and they pin it on one individual, and people believe it, they make judgement on such an individual, they are biased because of the newspaper and if they are released by the courts then theres uproar in the press because of this. Maybe the press is wrong, maybe this person is innocent, maybe thats the case with saddam and any other such criminals, who knows? No one does. Rule Britannia yeah! lol |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Monday , March 20, 2006 01:35:05 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
I do not recall catboy saying he supported the terrorist in the movie or terrorism in general.
I, for one, abhor any terrorism, be it in the West bank, in Nothern Ireland or on the streets of Philly. But I think the film takes an extream, almost absurd standpoint to draw attention to the feelings other nations have about the USA and England always overstepping their bounds.
And yes, I love the United States. That is why I feel I have every right to bitch about it sometimes. I want this country to be better than it is. I love it so much that I want it to be greater. I don't want corruption in the government, racism and hatred in the streets, crime and drugs, violence and bigotry. And I believe we are slowly getting better. February 3, 1959
The Day The Music Died |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Tuesday, March 21, 2006 06:19:10 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: Catboy said: Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
people complain allot about 9/11, and I mean,, ya, it was a Big tragedy, it was sad, but do you know what was done in Iraq ? to you know How many people died that had nothing at all To do with 9/11 ? do you know that this "war" was just for OIL, not even for what happened in 9/11 ? Do you know that every day there's More Evidence of Bush being behind 9/11 ?,,, well,,, not really Bush,,,, his just a puppet,,, but the people who tell him what to do/ and what to say,,, Did you watch "Fahrenheit 9/11" yet ?. and even that movie was hiding allot of other facts, Alex Jones also gave more facts that Michael Moore missed out. I'm for Peace, I don't believe in Bombs and Terrorist acts, but I also don't believe in Wars for money, and in Pollution, and in what Bush is doing, and I honestly don't know why people keep voting him back, but I guess the other guy wasn't any "Hero" neither. What I'm saying is that, these movies are good because its making people Finally see Color, and not only Black & White / Good & Bad. See The Bigger Picture ! Try to understand what the Reasons for blowing a building up would be,,, even if its not a good enough reason, but atleast try to see why someone would wanna do something like that,, without it just being because his "bad" and you're "good",,,, because,,, Americans can become Terrorists too ,,, not only Immigrants, you know ?
The first thing I want to say is thatI never meant to sound harsh, and that's my bad for seeming that way. All I wanted to do was to ask a logical questions based upon the statements that were made.
When it comes down to it, my first point was about supporting "terrorists" in movies, and how those beliefs affect real life. Obviously, events in movies do not often happen in reality (maybe with the "Heat" bank robbery years ago, and some others). Even though events don't often permeate into real life, ideas, ideals, ways, and means often do. Case in point, "sticking it to the man." The terroist V "sticks it to the man" in London, Timothy McVeigh "sticks it to the man" in Oklahoma City, and Al Qeada "sticks it to the man" in New York City. All three of these groups, whether they are real or fictional have common ground and similar view-points in ideas, ideals, ways, and means.
The point: you can't have it both ways. You logically cannot support a fictional terrorist while condemning real terrorists, both parties of which have the same ideas, ideals, ways, and means of "sticking it to the man" - or in this case, hatred of government, killing innocents and destroying property.
People often want their cake and eat it to. Another case in point is saying that Bush invaded Iraq simply for oil. A lot of people believe this and are very angry. However, if this is what they believe, is it not hypocritical for these people to continue to go to the local gas station to fill up on the substance that Bush went to war over? Even further, would it not also be hypocritical to line the pockets of the oil companies when paying $2.50 a gallon to give those companies record-breaking profits in 2005? Again, you can't have it both ways. If people really believe Bush went to war for oil, then they need to stop giving the oil companies money. Otherwise, your actually supporting Bush.
The Iraq war is touchy topic. I don't agree with the Administration's excuse of WMD's to invade. However, I will say kicking Saddam out of power and finding 600 mass graves of the thousands of people he killed is a noble effort. I'll say that finding out that France, Russia, and Germany were getting kickbacks from the Oil-for-Food program has exposed the reasons why there was not a "coalition" like the first Gulf War (the world now knows that these three countries were all in bed with Saddam). I'll also say that it's interesting to note that more documents coming out of Iraq shows that Saddam had meetings with bin Laden's people and perhaps bin Laden himself. And even further, the US military was able to shut down an Al Qeada training camp in Northern Iraq. All of this is true and can be researched through boortz.com or google.
And the last point, it was recommended that I see Farrinhiet 911. Micheal Moore has been proven to be a liar through his editing of news footage throughout all of that movie. I say movie, because if it was a documentary, he would show both sides of the issue...which I've heard he doesn't do. He's such a left wing hack, he's doesn't have credibility anymore. A single example. I've heard in the movie that it says Bush is the one who sends bin Laden's family - here in the US - on a plane to get them out when all flights were grounded. It's been proven, from actual statements, that it was Richard Clarke - the terror Czar for Bush 41, Clinton, and for part of Bush 42. To add to that, both F-911 and Clarke's book - one that bashes the President - came out at the exact same time. Interesting...
ok,,, I'm sorry I sounded harsh, The truth is, I'm actually enjoying this Threat allot because everyone is giving their opinion, and I like that, if someone doesn't agree with what I said .. I like when you say it and explain, and you did that Very Well !
now,, ya,, I agree about Michael Moore,, his not a guy you can trust 100%, but the film still shows a few shocking video's of what was done in Iraq, and this brings me to my other point, Even, Even, if this was about catching Saddam, they could of done it with out killing over thousand people, They killed more then the people who died in 9/11, and with NO prove that Saddam needed to be arrested, and about the OIL,,, I know ALLOT of people use OIL, but I'm happy to say, I'm not one of them,, I'm only 16 anyway,, but I don't plan to buy a car,,, I don't want to be stuck with it,, I wanna visit the world,,, so,, I don't use OIL,, my mom neither, we both use bus's & Metro's, and the money we save from not having a car, we use for Good camera's. a Good Computer, things that we need more,, I'm still gonna get a Driving License, just incase of emergency,,,, but that's besides the point.
I don't support Terrorists but I understand them, I don't like the fact that people have to die,,,, but if its an Empty Political Building, that "by blowing it up" might prove a point against the Government,, Then I Might Agree,,,, but not yet,,,, not if innocent people who have nothing to do with the topic have to die.
Hair Ball |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Wednesday, March 22, 2006 08:34:37 AM |
|
This has been a great thread, and I'm glad to be a part of this website.
In an earlier post, there was a comment about the media, and the fact that it cannot be relied upon, cannot be trusted, and if one can't see events in person, there may be no truth to it. To some extent, there is truth in that. As a regular American, I have to sit here and rely on the ethics of journalists and news companies to accuratly report the stories. CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the LA Times are seen as left-leaning, and may report their stories from the liberal point of view. Same with Fox News Channel and the Wall Street journal because they're seen as right-leaning. However, there are cases and stories that all media companies report on.
One such event was a story, with pictures and video, of a mass grave of 500 to 1000 victims unearthed in Iraq. It showed people with shovels hitting skulls and bones, and a machine digging through the ground. It also showed scores of women in a huge, open room looking over tattered and ruined clothes in hopes of identifying family members. This story was covered by all the news organization about two years ago.
Now, the first quesions one may ask is, did that really happen in Iraq? Did you see it with your own eyes? Couldn't it have been set up in the fashion of Wag the Dog? Again, all legitimate questions if that's the way you filter out all the information presented to you. But, it's also up to the individual to agree, disagree, or invalidate a news story. As much as CNN and MSNBC would hate to give President Bush any kind of credit for doing something good in Iraq, they - along with Fox News - covered the story.
This is just one example that Saddam Hussien had no care or regard for the Muslims in his country. For this reason, I feel he needed to be removed, and it probably should have been done a long time ago. We are seeing many other pieces of evidence of his disregard with his current trial where last week he admitted to killing 168 people who sought to overthrow him after the Gulf War. Also, when you read the United Nations investigation into the now defunct Oil-For-Food Program that he was supposed to trade his oil for other country's food for his people. That food never got the Iraqi people but sat under military control in storage facilities while Saddam got kickbacks to build his presidential palaces (it's all in the PDF file on Foxnews.com...don't know if it's still available).
I do feel most American hate and detest terrorism. I also think that if people want change, they need to realize they have it with voting. If people feel that Bush went to invade Iraq for oil, or because his dad said so, or for whatever reason, people had the chance. If Kerry had won, we may be in a different position. However, Bush won, and here we are. Timothy McViegh tried through violence to make change with the government. The government, however, didn't change and all he did was give pain to people he had never met. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Wednesday, March 22, 2006 11:52:23 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: This has been a great thread, and I'm glad to be a part of this website.
In an earlier post, there was a comment about the media, and the fact that it cannot be relied upon, cannot be trusted, and if one can't see events in person, there may be no truth to it. To some extent, there is truth in that. As a regular American, I have to sit here and rely on the ethics of journalists and news companies to accuratly report the stories. CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the LA Times are seen as left-leaning, and may report their stories from the liberal point of view. Same with Fox News Channel and the Wall Street journal because they're seen as right-leaning. However, there are cases and stories that all media companies report on.
One such event was a story, with pictures and video, of a mass grave of 500 to 1000 victims unearthed in Iraq. It showed people with shovels hitting skulls and bones, and a machine digging through the ground. It also showed scores of women in a huge, open room looking over tattered and ruined clothes in hopes of identifying family members. This story was covered by all the news organization about two years ago.
Now, the first quesions one may ask is, did that really happen in Iraq? Did you see it with your own eyes? Couldn't it have been set up in the fashion of Wag the Dog? Again, all legitimate questions if that's the way you filter out all the information presented to you. But, it's also up to the individual to agree, disagree, or invalidate a news story. As much as CNN and MSNBC would hate to give President Bush any kind of credit for doing something good in Iraq, they - along with Fox News - covered the story.
This is just one example that Saddam Hussien had no care or regard for the Muslims in his country. For this reason, I feel he needed to be removed, and it probably should have been done a long time ago. We are seeing many other pieces of evidence of his disregard with his current trial where last week he admitted to killing 168 people who sought to overthrow him after the Gulf War. Also, when you read the United Nations investigation into the now defunct Oil-For-Food Program that he was supposed to trade his oil for other country's food for his people. That food never got the Iraqi people but sat under military control in storage facilities while Saddam got kickbacks to build his presidential palaces (it's all in the PDF file on Foxnews.com...don't know if it's still available).
I do feel most American hate and detest terrorism. I also think that if people want change, they need to realize they have it with voting. If people feel that Bush went to invade Iraq for oil, or because his dad said so, or for whatever reason, people had the chance. If Kerry had won, we may be in a different position. However, Bush won, and here we are. Timothy McViegh tried through violence to make change with the government. The government, however, didn't change and all he did was give pain to people he had never met.
I remember this newspaper article, it was in the newspapers over here but there is no evidence to suggest Saddam is linked to this crime. Is there? There may be evidence of other crimes he has committed, he may have confessed to these, but who knows - quite like guy fawkes, did he give his confession freely or was it forced out of him. There is a conspiracy theory of guy fawkes, I am quite happy to believe that guy fawkes didnt do what they said he did, but could quite believe him of doing the crime, I can confess that looking at parliament as it stands today I believe that that caper is worth repeating and hopefully would be successful. And unless you live over here in the UK you couldnt understand this. Some people may feel this cruel or evil but it is not. At this rate we - the english are going to have our backsides handed to the germans on a plate, it makes it seem like we lost the second world war, the EU isn't quite a european union, rather a german one, germany is the biggest country in europe and therefore has more control over the union, so i say hitler won. we lost. so unless something is done, the old people who voted for the union will have made our efforts in WWII futile. But this is my opinion. Slightly gone off at a tangent here haven't I? Sorry. Rule Britannia yeah! lol |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Thursday, March 23, 2006 01:22:41 AM |
|
Contrapasso said: I also think that if people want change, they need to realize they have it with voting. If people feel that Bush went to invade Iraq for oil, or because his dad said so, or for whatever reason, people had the chance. If Kerry had won, we may be in a different position. However, Bush won, and here we are.
Hey, don't blame me. I voted against Bush twice. Unfortunately it's taken the rest of the country a little too long to agree with me. And given Bush's approval ratings, I would say most of the country does agree with me now. February 3, 1959
The Day The Music Died |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
| REPLIED Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:39:29 PM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 24, 2006 09:36:21 AM |
|
Pilch said: Are we talking about voting and voter apathy now? Or george bush, we have so completely gone off at a major tangent. do you think we ought to get back on track? Or do you think this is just the way this conversation has progressed?
I think in part that this discussion has developed into a theme of what choices people make when it comes to changing the government, the status quo, etc. Some people feel extreme messures must be taken to make change, as you had mentioned with your earlier post regarding the destruction of Parliment...unless of course I am in error. Obviously, I don't live in Europe, nor do I know much about the EU. But, I can comment that it seems you do not like Parliment nor Germany. So, it all comes back to my point about this thread. I think most people have been talking about how to bring about change, and it progressed into subjects about voting and the such.
With President George Bush as part of the discussion, he has an agenda to bring about change in Middle East, a change which he hopes to end terrorism by bringing democracy and freedom to places like Afghanistan and Iraq. Some people feel this hasn't happened, but I disagree. Afghanistan has been a major triumph, but Iraq has been difficult. Even more difficult will be Iran and Syria.
But, the theme is change, and George Bush tried to go through the proper channels by having the UN follow-up with it's resolutions - 14 of them, I might add - to use forece if Saddam ignored UN mandates. Saddam continued to ignore them, but the UN has no balls. The UN's just a bunch of men arguing and stalling and getting nothing done. So, if America and it's Allies - the British, the Italians, and others - say that force is necessary to remove Saddam, either the UN better do something about it, or the Allies will move in without a permission slip from the UN. And that's what happened because of France, Russia, and Germany's chose to not follow-up with the UN mandates, of which they originally voted for. So, now the change has been made, a brutal dictator is out, and the hard road to democray is underway.
Change was also talked about in an earlier post about trying to vote George Bush out of office. This is responsible, and the correct and moral way of going about change. In regards to Parliment, instead of destroying it, rally supporters and vote to change the people who work in Parliment. Same thing with the EU. You don't like something, vote against it. Don't be like the Palestinians and let things go to the wayside to let Hamas take over. Now there's a real mess over there. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 24, 2006 10:02:57 AM |
|
There's also the question about terrorist having a real reason for killing people. Every society contains violent people...many are just pawns of the "leaders" of a revolution. That's the trouble, I guess: To achieve any kind of rapid change, you have to get violent types involved.
So, I would put "terrorists" into a couple of types. The true terrorist, who wants anarchy and doesn't really care about "building" a new way of doing things. Seems to me, these are the ones to be despised, and that every society must hunt down and dispose of in whatever way seems appropriate.
The other group are terrorists that are more like revolutionaries. It's supposed to end at some point, and a new system evolves. It might take violence over years of time, like in Ireland, or be relatively short, such as the upheavals that led to the removal of many socialist/communist states in Europe.
This movie will make people think, and decide for themselves who they believe is a terrorist...not be told by their government who is. In all of us is the common sense to see that. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Friday , March 24, 2006 10:16:19 AM |
|
 |
| REPLIED Friday , June 16, 2006 08:47:18 PM |
|
Contrapasso said: I have a question for those of you supporting the terrorist in V for Vendetta (a movie I have not yet seen, which I will concede). In looking at your opinions from a logical standpoint, if you support this terrorist in this movie, as the poster "Catboy" does, does this mean that you will support Al Qeada in Oliver Stone's movie about the 9/11 attacks? It's all very easy to support a "comic book" terrorist; but, when you look at real life, which the attacks of 9/11 are, how can you say that this terrorist in V, or any other terrorist, is someone to glorify...unless you support the acts of killing innocents and destroying property? As far as the poster "Damageinc346" concerned, if for some reason you don't like the United States goverment, and the lifestyle you have, go live somewhere repressive like Syria in the Middle East or the Sudan in Africa. When your there do a quick comparison and let us know.
I have several questions for you. First, you skip the main type of terrorism that V for Vendetta is referring to. Do you know about the state terrorism? Do you know that, for instance, Hitler was democratically elected? Don't you think that, for instance, the National Socialist German Workers Party carried out a policy of state terrorism? because I think you aren't agree with this type of policies as the Hitler policy, are you? So,tell me who the terrorist is; groups, like Vendetta, that fight against opressor states inviting to the rest of citizens to the revolution and stoping the tyranny and totaliratian states like the one in V for Vendetta.
Second, because sometimes it's quite difficult for me to understand the edge between the terrorist and the military.
Could you tell me the difference between terrorist and the military of a state from a country that attacks and kills thousands and thousands of innocent civilians from other country on behalf of the "freedom" and the "democracy", and it's actually on behalf of economic interests, power and imperialism? Which is the difference between the terrorism ordinarily known and the state of a country which kills innocents for territorial and/or economic reasons? Aren't the ordinary terrorists killing innocents on behalf of "freedom" and against "tyranny"? In both cases, aren't they killing on behalf of similar reasons? Don't you think that they're actually looking for the power and don't care the people?
Apart from the terrorism, you forget other important matter that movie talks about: the media manipulation of the mass-media audience by any party in power. I think all of us should think about and wonder who's behind and controlling the media. As well as we should wonder how much information, which we receive, is manipulated due to interests from the power and if these interests coincide with the ones of the people and are ethical. In my point of view, this movie also makes you think about how much true parties in the power are telling us and if we aren't actually handled puppets by interests of just few powerful people who don't respect anything and have uncertain ethic. |
 |
Edit Reply w/Quote
|
 |
 |
| REPLIED Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:55:16 PM |
|
|
|
|